|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
In Reply to: Re: Pru in the news again! posted by Ken Young on June 02, 2003 at 09:29:24:
TO KY The Great
From: ME
So by inference, I suppose there is nothing wrong with Primerica either? Just the people there?
How much did Primerica pay you to post that one KY?
: TO: BUBBA FAT AKA MIKE WEAVER
: FROM: KEN YOUNG
: There is nothing wrong with Insurance Companies Including the Prudential.
: It is the PEOPLE WITHIN THE COMPANY who make an Insurance Company look bad amoung the public.
: With your reported "churning" activities and your "low unacceptable personal production" when you were with Prudential, you obviously can be counted among those bad choices who would have given any insurance company a bad name among the public.
: When the person interviewed you for your job position at Prudential, your employment background information denoting your personal ability to perform should have been checked out before you were hired. It appears the person interviewing you may have been put under pressure by his supervisor to fill a "Open Debit Book" with anyone so you got your job.
: If your background would have been check out first, the person who interviewed for the job opening would have discovered that you had previously been terminated after one year with a different insurance company for "low production" also, plus a charge of insubbordination which obviously by the tone of your postings on the Interent would have been justifed also.
: If they would have completed a background check they also would have uncovered that you had a half-dozen or more employment changes over the previous fifteen (15) year period.
: As another illustration of your lack of ability to perform and your own personal ambition, you sued Prudential (and lost by the way) because Prudential wouldn't let you stay on with the company keeping your job even though you were willing to work for the company for an income level earning $8.77 of commissions plus your debit collection book salary that would have generated you about a total combined pay of $115.00 a week.
: I feel quite confident in saying, if your ex-wife who was supporting you at that moment in time would have divorced you PRIOR to you being accepted for the agent's position with Prudential, you would have quit your job prior to being fired anyway.
: If that had been the case, then because you had quit and you were not fired, today on these types of messages boards your absence would have been obvious.
: If anyone wanted to visit with you at your new jobsite where you would had been better off than being an insurance agent, they could have found you at your local Taco Bell yammering, "Numer #17, your order is ready". :)
: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: According to today's WSJ is seems that Pru has business practice problems again. Like they ever stopped? Already knew that since there are a bunch of cases I found in MO some time ago heading for trial and lots more to come.
: : Seems like someone has been missing the boat!