KENS ORIGINAL STATEMENT -How would you interpret it?

We are not affiliated with any insurance company.
[Home] [Insurance Quotes] [Follow Ups] [Post Followup]
[100 Insurers Message Board] [FAQ]

Posted by eric (172.155.94.186) on December 03, 2002 at 00:36:08:

Ken:
Here is your original statement:

"You claim you work at a bank now instead of working in an office as you previously stated and you don't even know the rule of thumb that twelve years ago $127,000 a year would have had the purchasing power of approximately $250,000 in today's money?"

Im sorry Ken, but where in this post do you say ANYTHING about this being a specific example to you? You never say it is YOUR personal inflation rate. You say it is a RULE OF THUMB. You say that you find it hard to believe that, me working at a bank, dont know about this "rule of thumb"?
How would ANYONE know your rule of thumb if they dont know your personal expenses? Expenses you never posted until a LATER post expenses that show a 7.8% inflation rate)? Tell me how I could have misinterpreted this statement? How would anyone interpret this statement?

Eric



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: Re: KENS ORIGINAL STATEMENT -How would you interpret it?

Comments:


Please enter the characters in the image above.



[Home] [Insurance Quotes] [Follow Ups] [ Post Followup] [100 Insurers Message Board] [FAQ]