|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
In Reply to: Re: Re: WHAT DO INSURANCE COMPANIES DO WITH CASH VALUES IN CV POLICIES posted by Ken Young on August 30, 2001 at 09:19:46:
Well here we are again folks, our favorite poster who avoids answering questions to this message board other than questions to PFS simply because he does not know the answers to the general insurance questions posted.
--LOL. What a hypocrite you are, Ken. You complain that I haven’t answered your questions (I have, but you don’t like the answers), yet you yourself refuse to answer most questions posed to you. Instead, in order to avoid exposing your ignorance you change the subject or insist that it has to be a money thing with your “$50,000 challenge.” You state that you post on these boards as a “free public service” then you turn around and make it in to a money issue.
Now I can understand that since he spent a number of years so he says with Primerica as a "Dork", (the uniformed)
--It’s unINformed, Ken. Everyone already knows that Primerica reps don’t wear uniforms.
Now as can be viewed on the message board that he is the main contributor to that is attempting to parrot this message board to compete with it, here his (sic) is back here attempting to disrupt the flow of information on this message board and discredit my postings.
--Ken, you discredit yourself by posting incorrect information. All I do is point it out.
The amazing part about his actions is that he now claims that he has left Primerica and he is still in the insurance and financial services industry.
--What’s so amazing about that, Ken? Is this news to you that I’m still in the industry? Is that the amazing part? Many former Primerica reps are still in the industry. In fact, some of them even post to your message board. I don’t see you harping on them because it’s so amazing that they are still in this industry.
Is he the type of insurance agent who only has a limited knowledge of life insurance an annuity knowledge who would attempt to disrupt the general public from obtaining a more qualified knowledge of all forms of insurance the average consumer would want for their own insurance agent?
--No, he’s not. He’s the kind of insurance agent that fully explains the client options and then let’s THEM make an educated decision.
I have posed two simple questions for him to answer on the message board he seems to be concentrating his efforts on which admittedly the sponsor stated was to harass me.
--And I’ve answered both of them. Just because you don’t like the answers doesn’t change that.
Could the answer to this be that I refuse to post educational messages surrounding the mechanics of insurance on that board is now competing for attention, or could it be that he is seeking revenge against me for the work I performed in the past and I am also presently involved in which cost him personally many thousands of dollars when he was associated for those many years with PFS?
--No, it couldn’t. It doesn’t matter to me if your post your “education messages” on this board, your board or the board you say is “competing for attention”. It doesn’t matter where they’re posted, the incorrect content is still the same.
He refuses to respond to my question of what qulaifes (sic) him to be looked upon as an educated and well informed insurance agent.
--No, I didn’t, you just didn’t like my answer.
He refuses to respond to my question as to how many people he ripped off and trained agents under him to ripp (sic) off that he as made financial restitution to now that he posts messages how evil the PFS sales division is.
--Again, no I didn’t, you were just looking for a different answer.
Well as evident on the message board he contributes to bashing and libeling me and the messages he has posted here with the exception of the PFS matter the messages don't add up to a hill of beans,
--As opposed to yours, that do? Let’s see, we can take for example your incorrect IRA posts, your $20 million Primerica fine post and your Sandy Weill bought his award post. LOL, I’d rather have the hill of beans than the inaccurate spew that you post on a regular basis.
he seems to be seeking retaliation against me for backing him into a corner and exposing him as a person who is not yet ready to assume a leadership role to offer advice
--You haven’t backed anyone in to a corner, Ken
and he simplay (sic) can not demand from the public that his information pertaining to general insurance matters is worthy of listening to.
--Like your advice is worthy of listening to? LOL.
In cases of similar nature as I have outlined above, my experience has been simply for the viewers and those persons seeking qualified information to a question they may have is to simply disregard his rhetoric and get on with the intended business of helping consumers, not letting people like that disrupt the flow of information on this message board.
--Funny, you tell people to “disregard his rhetoric”, yet you are the ONLY one responding to it. What a hypocrite!
You no longer see the poster steve posting message here do you? It is because he attempted to disrupt the fow (sic) of qualified information to this message board by filing three seperate (sic) complaints against me to the domain owner which of course were to no avail.
--I thought you said that I was Steve. First you say I’m Steve and then you say that Steve isn’t posting here anymore. How can that be, Ken? Your immmagination (sic) is getting the best of you.