|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: To posted by Eugine on January 07, 2001 at 07:39:33:
Eugine,
Maybe you need to follow this post line. The discussion is if the cost of insurance is more expensive for someone buy term compared to W.L. We are talking a 25 year old buying insurance till the age 65. We are talking total cost for that 40 years. I am not interested in U.L. NO WAY, NO HOW. I'll stick to my term and M.F. they have done me very well over the past 9 years. Yes, my M.F. are set up in a Roth I.R.A.
: Hi Ray,
: Be careful, primerica only sell term. If the guy sell you primerica and W.L. don't touch with that guy. Primerica don't allow their agent to do both.
: If you buy 20 yr term. when you reach 65, term is expensive. every 20 year you need to re-new.
: Why you choose W.L. this even expensive. Also you don't know the investment. You should get the universal life. It's more better for you.
: 31 year old. Get 250k-300k, save some money for your 65. get a fixrd rate, also you can get guarante 20 year pay off. It's cool...
: I'll suggest you to take a look of the universal life.