|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
In Reply to: Re: Re: Car insurance posted by Ken Young on September 19, 2003 at 10:05:57:
: Are we hearing you say that even when jumping out infront of the inquirer into his lane he scraped the the inquirer's car and then jammed on his breaks that the inquirer doesn't have a case?
I didn't hear him say that. If you heard him say that, you must be hearing things.
: Would you still say a general statement of "No" without obtaining additional information or at least explaining in further detail why your answer is a one word answer of "No"?
He did explain. That part I heard. Did you read anything past the first two letters of the post?
: Just curious as to your answer of "No" and nothing more than that is intended. :)
Actually, I think you need to get a job, or at least learn to read with a bit of accuracy. The original explanation which followed the introductory word "No" follows:
: : Seems unfair, but anytime you hit another vehicle from behind, it can easily be argued you were following too close (you couldn't stop in time, therefore you were too close). You are generally required to travel far enough behind traffic in front of you to stop in time to avoid a collision, no matter how fast they stop.
:
: : : I hit some body's car in back while he just change his line, but he was all the way in the line that i hit him, what coz the accedent was Yellow Light he hit his breaks so hard but i couldn't stop my car and hit his car's back .
: : : is there any way that i can win this claim from my insurance company